My Experience with Open Source
I am realizing there are good and bad aspects to both Firefox and Open Office, but both are comparable to their non-open source counter parts.
Firefox is great for organization (which is helpful for someone like me) by saving a session and allowing me to return where I left off when I close Firefox. It also keeps track of sites I visited and brings them up automatically when I type a URL that has similar text in it. The features are accessible and easy to read, and it runs as fast as any web sever available.
However...
Firefox routinely crashed, leaving me to continually restart the program. This doesn't seem like to be a significant issue, but it's not a problem I had with Safari. This happened more often when I used ESPN360, (a tool for watching live sporting events through espn.com) which would make me move to Safari in order to watch the game (because I'm not giving up watching sports for something silly like principles).
Open Office had the same ups and downs. There were times I could not tell there was a difference between it and Word, and I actually preferred Open Office to Macintosh Pages. It surpassed both programs by offering features like finishing longer words when I started to type them.
However...
Open Office required three more steps to open a document then Pages or Word. If I saved a document in Open Office, I had to start Open Office first and then open the document through the program. If I opened the document by just going to the folder it was saved under, it would have opened through TextEdit. This may be more of a problem with the settings on my computer, but as for now it is a hassle.
Also, Pages allows me to save a document in Pages or as a Word Document. This offers options when sending a document to someone using Microsoft Word. (I know Dr. Pfaffman has asked us to swear off sending Word attachments, but I have not learned this yet.) Open Office does not always work as an attachment, which is frustrating when turning in an assignment.
Open Office and Firefox have as many strengths and weaknesses as their non-open source rivals, and consumers need to determine which meets their needs. But Open Office and Firefox offer one feature non-open source programs cannot; Freedom from Microsoft and Macintosh.
Firefox is great for organization (which is helpful for someone like me) by saving a session and allowing me to return where I left off when I close Firefox. It also keeps track of sites I visited and brings them up automatically when I type a URL that has similar text in it. The features are accessible and easy to read, and it runs as fast as any web sever available.
However...
Firefox routinely crashed, leaving me to continually restart the program. This doesn't seem like to be a significant issue, but it's not a problem I had with Safari. This happened more often when I used ESPN360, (a tool for watching live sporting events through espn.com) which would make me move to Safari in order to watch the game (because I'm not giving up watching sports for something silly like principles).
Open Office had the same ups and downs. There were times I could not tell there was a difference between it and Word, and I actually preferred Open Office to Macintosh Pages. It surpassed both programs by offering features like finishing longer words when I started to type them.
However...
Open Office required three more steps to open a document then Pages or Word. If I saved a document in Open Office, I had to start Open Office first and then open the document through the program. If I opened the document by just going to the folder it was saved under, it would have opened through TextEdit. This may be more of a problem with the settings on my computer, but as for now it is a hassle.
Also, Pages allows me to save a document in Pages or as a Word Document. This offers options when sending a document to someone using Microsoft Word. (I know Dr. Pfaffman has asked us to swear off sending Word attachments, but I have not learned this yet.) Open Office does not always work as an attachment, which is frustrating when turning in an assignment.
Open Office and Firefox have as many strengths and weaknesses as their non-open source rivals, and consumers need to determine which meets their needs. But Open Office and Firefox offer one feature non-open source programs cannot; Freedom from Microsoft and Macintosh.
